Friday, November 30, 2012

Pay to Play - It happens all of the time

Comment Up


Everyone knows that pay to play happens on a regular basis. When we think of pay to play, what immediately comes to mind is our political system: when money or gifts are exchanged directly for political favors, such as generous campaign donations. This has happened in Lake Worth. Often times, however, it involves paid government employees and not just elected officials.

In order to be ensured of contracts, companies not just bid on the RFP's but wine and dine and spend money on those directly involved in making decisions. If that "corrupt" company knows the bids and is in collusion with a "corrupt" employee, it is easy to direct the final outcome as awards are given usually to the low bidder. The secret is not to get caught.

In today's society, everyone wants to make money, not only the honest way but sometimes by any means possible.  It is a cut-throat society and a vast majority of us find it more and more difficult to stay afloat. When temptation is there, some get hooked and throw ethics aside.  Something as innocent as a Christmas gift from a vendor can snow ball to garner influence down the road. 

Chaz Equipment Company was indicted in the biggest local public corruption sweep in at least 10 years, prosecutors say. Chaz involved itself and supplied employees in nine local governments with hunting trips, NASCAR excursions, pricey jewelry and gift cards. It was proved that gifts paralleled  the contracts. It was suggested that Chaz made $73 million over the last decade by playing the game to get contract awards.

Gary Czajkowski, President of Chaz, was just acquitted in one charge of giving a "loan" of $25,000 to the construction manager of the Town of Palm Beach for street work. Sometimes it is difficult to prove "intent." Other corruption charges are pending.

In spite of the ethics training all employees must take here in Lake Worth (all employees are now in compliance and have taken the Palm County ethics training) with full knowledge of Lake Worth policy discouraging accepting gifts of over $25, temptation is a reality. According to the Palm Beach Ethics Czar, you can't give a gift of over $100 if you are a lobbyist or a vendor or prospective vendor of the city.

This practice of gift giving appeared to be standard operation procedure for Chaz. And if that is proven to be the case, who is to say that other cities or even all cities have not been affected by this practice by many companies, not just Chaz. Chaz has done business in our city as well.

10 comments:

Anonymous said...

Please provide an example of corruption that happened in Lake Worth. Are you referring to certain campaign donations made to a certain ex-commissioner that was supposed to save the casino and John G's? that kind of corruption and deception?

Lynn Anderson said...

I suppose the most immediate one that comes to mind is Sun Recycling. And no, I am not referring to beach merchants who were all grandfathered in at our casino. Totally different deal, anonymous. You know it. I know it. The world knows it. Don't you ever get tired of dishing the crapola?

As far as John G's is concerned, it was their option and ultimate business decision to go to Manalapan for various reasons...difficulty doing business in LW I heard.

Anonymous said...

Dishing the crapola?
"Grandfathered" merchants give campaign contributions based on the promise the casino was going to be "saved". No crapola here. I happened
Building gets demolished. No crapola here. Building is gone.
Merchants move on. No crapola here. There's new merchants.
Commissioner that took campaign contributions based on saving the casino failed miserably. No crapola here.
After taking the money and screwing the city out of $2.4 million the unnamed commissioner is out of site and incommunicado about the whole matter. No crapola here, it all really happened.
It's only crapola if you're a revisionist and you need and desire for history to be as you would like it to be not as it actually was.

Lynn Anderson said...

Merchants always gave campaign contributions ever since I have been interested in politics in this city, not only beach merchants but those downtown. I don't know why you continue to want to re-write history to your political point of view. Can you enlighten us? Is that why you keep losing campaigns?

5 commissioners voted to end the contract with GB. The City settled with Greater Bay. The city is responsible for "losing" the money.

Stop being a revisionist and changing facts and changing the truth.

Anonymous said...

anony do you even know what pay to play is? Doesn't sound like it. How did Mulvehill benefit? Because she believed in the casino and wanted it to remain in public control and in the same location? You honestly think that voting greater bay off the beach was of personal benefit to her? Really?

Anonymous said...

Give us the pay to play related to Sun Recycling. You seem to like making accusations without substantiated facts based on second hand knowledge. There were many lies put there by Cara and company to move their agenda forward. Give us the facts instead of slandering others.

Lynn Anderson said...

Who's being slandered, anonymous? It is a totally different situation when a vendor wants our business than a beach merchant who is grandfathered in at our LW Casino. So let's not get insulting here.

AGAIN--The beach merchants were grandfathered in--their right to lease was guaranteed in the casino. The decision had been made to build/refurbish in this location. There was no other serious plan on the table. So, how did Mulvehill benefit? Do you have something against our long term tenants at the beach? I would suspect that the merchants appreciated loyalty and the fact that they had been there for over 3 decades. It wouldn't be any different from a downtown merchant giving a campaign contribution to a commissioner who was opposed to downtown parking meters as an example. That commissioner would not be getting any personal gain but only voting the will of the people he represents.

Anonymous said...

You still did not give any facts about how pay to play relates to Sun Recycling. By posting a comment like that about a business entity in the public domain could be precieved as slanderous.

Lynn Anderson said...

Only slanderous by you or someone else who took a campaign contribution over $100 from a vendor that has or wants to do business in our city. AGAIN, the beach merchants were grandfathered in. There was nothing to gain by any commissioner or by them.

Anonymous said...

Pam Triolo,Andy Amaroso,and Scott Maxwell at the same taxpayer funded league of cities meeting. That is corruption-out of the sunshine conversations to get them all in lock step for upcoming issues.. Everyone in Lake Worth shoould run screaming to the county ethics officer.